<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pondering the unponderable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybrpunk.com/2007/06/04/pondering-the-unponderable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybrpunk.com/2007/06/04/pondering-the-unponderable/</link>
	<description>Holy smeg I need a theme!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 07:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday Tinkles at cybrpunk.com</title>
		<link>http://cybrpunk.com/2007/06/04/pondering-the-unponderable/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday Tinkles at cybrpunk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybrpunk.com/?p=117#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] this is yet another reason why I shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to make up my own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is yet another reason why I shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to make up my own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://cybrpunk.com/2007/06/04/pondering-the-unponderable/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybrpunk.com/?p=117#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...

1. It isn&#039;t the movement that would bother me... it would be the talking.

2. Kill both ... to be fair.

3. Why would anyone want to escape my warranted destruction of their city?

4. Only if a lawyer is present.

5. Only one thing to say &quot;Two dogs enter, one dog leaves!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>1. It isn&#8217;t the movement that would bother me&#8230; it would be the talking.</p>
<p>2. Kill both &#8230; to be fair.</p>
<p>3. Why would anyone want to escape my warranted destruction of their city?</p>
<p>4. Only if a lawyer is present.</p>
<p>5. Only one thing to say &#8220;Two dogs enter, one dog leaves!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybrpunk</title>
		<link>http://cybrpunk.com/2007/06/04/pondering-the-unponderable/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>cybrpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybrpunk.com/?p=117#comment-111</guid>
		<description>My answers:
1: I would think the living dead would be a turn off to a necrophiliac.  I&#039;m not sure exactly what makes them tick but I imagine the lifelessness and the control are important.  The fact that they could get eaten probably messes with them.

2: Hard one, but I suppose that depends on which one I liked more.  If times were bad and you thinking of knocking off the spouse anyway, well bonus for you.  Or vice-versa with the kid.  If you don&#039;t like either of them...  screw &#039;em.  Both of their bodies  will delay the enemy even more to give you an even better chance to get away.  Hypothetically....

3: I see no point in joining the masses killing each other trying to escape or sitting in traffic on the highways.  Might as well go have some fun.  Whatever that means for you especially since you may be dead soon anyway.

4: No, I don&#039;t think so.  Unless there was a sure way to trick-the-trickster so to speak.  Kind of like the old fairy tales.  But I&#039;ve seen those Wishmaster movies.  I&#039;ve yelled at the screen.  I&#039;m not risking it.

5: No, I would try and get them to leave me.  I&#039;d stand a better chance of getting found if people saw the dogs walking around anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My answers:<br />
1: I would think the living dead would be a turn off to a necrophiliac.  I&#8217;m not sure exactly what makes them tick but I imagine the lifelessness and the control are important.  The fact that they could get eaten probably messes with them.</p>
<p>2: Hard one, but I suppose that depends on which one I liked more.  If times were bad and you thinking of knocking off the spouse anyway, well bonus for you.  Or vice-versa with the kid.  If you don&#8217;t like either of them&#8230;  screw &#8216;em.  Both of their bodies  will delay the enemy even more to give you an even better chance to get away.  Hypothetically&#8230;.</p>
<p>3: I see no point in joining the masses killing each other trying to escape or sitting in traffic on the highways.  Might as well go have some fun.  Whatever that means for you especially since you may be dead soon anyway.</p>
<p>4: No, I don&#8217;t think so.  Unless there was a sure way to trick-the-trickster so to speak.  Kind of like the old fairy tales.  But I&#8217;ve seen those Wishmaster movies.  I&#8217;ve yelled at the screen.  I&#8217;m not risking it.</p>
<p>5: No, I would try and get them to leave me.  I&#8217;d stand a better chance of getting found if people saw the dogs walking around anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

